How many phds work at google

Follow Quartz. These are some of our most ambitious editorial projects. From our Obsession. Sign me up. Update your browser for the best experience. How depressing. A PhD is not necessarily so you learn about the subject. He now works as a computer programmer.

This may seem a little weird, but if you think about it, a PhD [hopefully] shows that you're willing to apply yourself to something and do hard work. People with PhDs should be the most intelligent of the bunch, as they managed to get the thing. Oxford doesn't give out PhDs. Score: 5 , Informative. Since the moderators obviously didn't understand the joke: A doctorate from Oxford is a D.

Phil short for "Doctor of Philosophy" , in contrast to most other universities, which use the term PhD Philosophiae Doctor, which is exactly the same thing in Latin. I have a MS in EE. I was offered a scholarship to do a PhD. However during my MS thesis work I worked closely with PhD candidates and suffered perhaps a fraction of what they did. My observations are as follows: 1 PhD is a lot of work for yourself, and x more work doing your professors busy work papers etc.

I can't recommend it enough, if I personally thought there was money in a PhD this is what I'd do myself. If your professor administrates whatever finances your degree, and you are above broccoli intelligence, he WILL try to hold you as long as he can years in most schools. If your company is paying the bill they are quite good at getting you in and out ASAP.

Avg stay of corporate funded PhD students in my experience was 3 years. Do this! Simply put, professors want stupid people out of their hair, if they can't wash em out, they graduate em. Just like elementary school. The arrangement is beautiful - I get paid to do my PhD. A PhD isn't about learning facts. It's about learning HOW to do research. The important thing is that when told to find out something new about "The Hydration of Tri-Calcium Silicate", you can do so.

The same person can also be told to find out something new about search engine algorithms, and hopefully do a good job of it. I've worked with a number of Phd candidates in computer science, chemical engineering, history, and life sciences, and then EXPECT yes, I said expect one of two things to happen when they graduate:. Start here [phdcomics.

Well, I have some perspective on this Score: 5 , Insightful. I do computer support for an engineering department on campus. Means I deal with supporting PhDs and masters students and undergrads. For many of the PhDs, this isn't an unfair generalization. They are so focused on their one little area of expertise, that they seem to loose all basic knowledge. This is an engineering department here, so people should have a little technical skill. None the less I've solved printer problems that stumped a room full of masters and PhD students by turning the printer on really, twice.

They ought to have the basic electrical knowledge and problem solving skills to figure this out. The DID at one time to pass the undergrad courses. Now that's not to say there aren't some really smart PhDs out there. We have them here too and they are fun to work with. But there are plenty that aren't. Working here has really shown me that having a PhD doesn't mean your smart, just means that you could play the game long enough and well enough. Don't have to be rich Score: 5 , Interesting.

Typically, PhD students teach while they're working on their PhD. They don't have to, but they can typically pay their way through school. Other then that there is always student loans. Here come the ignorant assholes Score: 4 , Informative. Here come the ignorant assholes who will knock on getting a Ph. Sure, I'll accept that a Ph.

Our department is hiring programmers right now, and I would probably veto a Ph. But I am sick of hearing everyone with lesser education cover for their insecurity and lack of accomplishment by knocking higher educational goals. There are many developers who do work that makes my job look simple, but considering I only have an AA in CompSci, I think I am doing fairly well. I work on the same level as individuals who have BSCS in CompSci and some who have 20 years experience in development.

However, I don't have a lack of appreication for their superior education and experience. Not to try to bring in a major paycheck I already do very well , and not to try to be better than those who only have a BSCS, but because Computer Science is my field. It is my study, my hobby, and I have dedicated my life to it. Since I consider myself a budding Computer Scientist, it is simply my responsibility and my desire to continue to advance in the field and learn everything I can about all of the many aspects of Computer Science.

We have one such person working in our customer service department. But people who actually attend a university, any real university, and learn the science of computers, are a league above those who would criticize what they cannot attain. Just because you couldn't make it in college doesn't mean college has no value. Just because you didn't stick it out long enough to learn something, doesn't mean colleges don't teach CompSci principles which no self-taught person will understand and appreciate.

The only reasons to not advance your education further are your own reasons, so to attempt to apply them to everyone and make blanket statements about higher educational levels than your own seems more like a desperate attempt to cover your insecurity that there might be people out there who know more than you do, even if your non-tech manager and your family members think you're the God of Computers.

Keeping your employees happy Re:Keeping your employees happy Score: 3 , Interesting. I believe Gmail came directly out of somone's "free time" - I'll try to find the article I agree totally. Having an army of PHD's doesn't guarantee anything unless they enjoy what they are doing and able to use all their skills effectively. It also helps if they able to branch off into things that they enjoy as hobbies for a time as well. The more flexibility an employee has in doing their job within reason the more successful they will be in completing the job.

Just watch all the other companies following Google after this becomes a big success. I like to see how google has adapted bits of the opensource development model to fit their needs. Just let people do it because they want to do it, don't force them. See, even the deleopment model is is free as in freedom.

They aren't using the "opensource development model", they are giving their employees what they want. I swear, these "Dude, that cool thing is totally like open source! Isn't open source great? Any kind of scientific research, for example. It's by no means mandatory but it is almost expected.

Very true. It's a requirement for a job as a chemist. The focus on stock price over all else such as real, tangible, actual profits will be the death of many a formerly powerful and truly innovative company, I expect. From Monster. From monster. Working smarter not harder Score: 5 , Insightful. Google is proof that using a smarter aproach is often the best way to solve a problem. If Google tried to use the naive clustering model their expenses would have massivly higher and their scalability and fault tolerance would have been much lower.

It seems that Google realizes that the best way to hire and retain the people that will continue to come up with the smarter aproaches is to offer them things that not many other employers are, time to do what intellectually stimulates them for instance.

Re:Working smarter not harder Score: 3 , Insightful. Its fine that Google is doing this now, but they are still small and closely held. The key is if they become a mature and larger company and still retain these factors. Re:Working smarter not harder Score: 5 , Interesting. Actually, vs. Re:Working smarter not harder Score: 4 , Interesting. Microsoft went public back in '86 for another reason, too. Employee stock options weren't worth much until the shares they represented could be traded.

The company itself didn't benefit very much from the IPO -- it was ten years old, and highly profitable already -- but the employees did. Don't forget Score: 4 , Insightful. That track record is not a a good argument for using a 'traditional' business model.

There is no doubt Google has beaten the odds, and they have done some things differently. Google is a good case study. Everything they do should be reviewed for lessons in success. Score: 4 , Funny. On this page [google.

Now they're up to ? Score: 4 , Interesting. Good for Google, but let's hope they don't get carried away. I remember when a local telecom company tried to up-size their education level.

No exceptions. This meant that janitors, cafeteria staff, etc. As I recall, they changed this policy after about 6 months. Waitaminute Score: 4 , Funny. Google is focusing on the wrong aspect, they have got their foot in the door allready, they need to take a page from other big corporations.

Once you get Ub3r Big and popular you need more JD's. Is the PHD the best thing? Although having an advanced degree is great, some of the best tech sector innovators come without advanced degrees. Re:Is the PHD the best thing? Like reading Slashdot? But, I work for the government, and there isn't much to do most of the time PhDs are sort of a double-edged sword Score: 5 , Interesting.

I guess it's a good thing to see someone hiring a lot of PhDs these days. Most people with PhDs in technical fields especially the sciences these days have a lot of trouble finding any kind of employment, because once someone sees that "PhD" on your resume and you're not applying for, say, thermodynamic research at GE or machine translation research at Google, they just toss it in a wastebasket. Re:PhDs are sort of a double-edged sword Score: 5 , Informative.

Re:PhDs are sort of a double-edged sword Score: 5 , Insightful. Re:PhDs are sort of a double-edged sword Score: 4 , Informative. Re:PhDs are sort of a double-edged sword Score: 3 , Insightful.

From earlier, however: Easier for me to just put their resume in the 'do not hire' pile Oops, I guess they just don't even get a chance. Sad, really. I don't know how many masters you actually have applying, but many may stay with the company. This number can be increased by promoting them to the second tier faster.

As a way out, you could provide a one month trial period; state that as they are masters, you expect more. Re:PhDs are sort of a double-edged sword Score: 4 , Interesting. Oops, I guess they just don't even get a chance.

That it is. The details of each Fellowship vary by region. Please see our FAQ for eligibility requirements and application instructions. PhD students apply directly during the application window. Please see the FAQ for more information. Applications for the program will open in February and close in May Notification of decisions will be made by June Applications for the program will open in April and close in May Notification of decisions will be made by September Data visualization initiative Data USA reports that in there were only 34, people in the workforce with doctorate degrees in computer science — just 0.

Snap Inc. For perspective, just 9. With such a small percentage of Americans holding the degrees that companies like Google and Snap are looking for, many Silicon Valley CEOs are trying to make schools more like start-ups that will train the workforce they'd like to hire.